THE EFFECT OF NPK FERTILIZER APPLICATION RATES ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF MAIZE (A CASE STUDY OF MAIZE FARMERS IN GWAGWALADA AREA COUNCIL, FCT)
Get access/download the complete chapters 1 to 5, abstract, references and questionnaire delivered to your WhatsApp or email.
CHAPTER
ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background of the Study
Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the most
important cereal crops in Nigeria, used as human food, as livestock and poultry
feed and as an industrial raw material. According to United States Department
of Agriculture figures quoted by Ngonadi et al. (2023), Nigerian maize production
rose to about 11.6 million tonnes in 2021/2022, which reflects the size of the
crop's role in food supply and farm incomes.
Maize responds strongly to fertilizer because
it grows fast, produces a large amount of biomass and takes up large quantities
of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. Many savanna soils are low in organic
matter and in these nutrients. Muhammad et al. (2024) list low soil fertility,
poorly distributed rainfall, non-use of optimum plant density, poor
implementation of improved agronomic practices and use of indigenous unimproved
varieties among the factors that limit large-scale maize production in their study
area. Ederigbe et al. (2024), working on four farmers' fields at Minna, found
that the soils were moderately to slightly acidic and low in soil organic
carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus.
NPK fertilizer is the most commonly used source
of these nutrients. The widely sold NPK 15:15:15 contains equal proportions of
nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, so that, for example, 150 kg/ha supplies
22.5 kg each of N, P2O5 and K2O (Ederigbe et al., 2024), which is a small
amount compared with the needs of a productive maize crop. The application rate
therefore matters: too little leaves the crop short of nutrients and lowers
yield, while too much raises cost, may be wasted and can harm soil and water.
Nigerian trials show how maize responds to NPK
rate. At Samaru in the northern Guinea savanna, Muhammad et al. (2024) tested
NPK rates of 200, 300 and 400 kg/ha with four intra-row spacings and three
varieties. They found that each increase in NPK from 200 to 400 kg/ha
significantly produced taller plants, longer ear height, heavier 100-grain
weight and higher grain yield and shortened the number of days to 50%
tasseling, and they recommended 400 kg/ha of NPK with the variety SAMMAZ 40 at
20 or 25 cm intra-row spacing. In the southern Guinea savanna at Minna,
Ederigbe et al. (2024) compared the farmers' usual practice of 150 kg/ha of NPK
15:15:15 with a special-blend NPK at 600 kg/ha, cow dung and combinations of
these. All fertilized treatments significantly outperformed the unfertilized
control in plant height and leaf area index, there were no significant
differences among the NPK treatments and their combinations with cow dung, and
the special-blend NPK produced the tallest plants and the highest yield (1.92
t/ha).
These studies show that NPK application raises
maize growth and yield and that rates recommended on research stations are well
above those farmers commonly apply. They also show that the response depends on
the soil, the variety and the particular fertilizer product used. What farmers
actually apply, how they choose the rate, and what they observe on their own
fields are matters that experimental trials do not record.
Gwagwalada Area Council is in the Federal
Capital Territory, in the Guinea savanna, where maize is grown by smallholders
during the rainy season. This study therefore used a structured questionnaire
to examine the NPK application rates used by maize farmers in Gwagwalada and
their perceived effects on the growth and yield of maize.
1.2
Statement of the Problem
Maize farmers in Gwagwalada Area Council use
NPK fertilizer, but the rates they apply differ and are usually decided by
price, availability and personal experience rather than by soil test or
recommendation. Experimental evidence shows that yield rises with NPK rate on
savanna soils (Muhammad et al., 2024) and that the farmers' usual rate of 150
kg/ha may be well below what is needed for high yields (Ederigbe et al., 2024),
but it is not known what rates farmers in Gwagwalada use or how they perceive
the results.
The studies reviewed here were conducted at
Samaru and Minna, partly on research stations and partly on farmers' fields in
other agro-ecological conditions (Ederigbe et al., 2024; Muhammad et al.,
2024), and the literature consulted for this study did not reveal a survey of
NPK application rates and perceived effects among maize farmers in Gwagwalada.
Because soil fertility and rainfall differ between locations, results from
other sites cannot be assumed to hold in Gwagwalada.
As a result, farmers may apply too little
fertilizer, so that yields stay low, or may spend on more than the crop can
use. Extension agents also lack local information on which to base advice. This
study was undertaken to provide it.
1.3
Objectives of the Study
The main objective of the study was to assess
the effect of different NPK fertilizer application rates on the growth and
yield of maize among farmers in Gwagwalada Area Council, FCT, using a
structured questionnaire. The specific objectives, each of which corresponds to
a section of the questionnaire, were to:
(i) describe the
socio-economic characteristics of the respondents, namely age, sex, educational
level, farming experience, farm size and source of labour.
(ii) identify the
NPK fertilizer rates and methods of application currently used by the
respondents in the production of maize
(iii) ascertain the
respondents' perception of the effect of different NPK fertilizer application
rates on the growth of maize ;
(iv) ascertain the
respondents' perception of the effect of different NPK fertilizer application
rates on the yield of maize ; and
(v) identify the
constraints faced by the respondents in the use of different NPK fertilizer
application rates and the measures they suggest for improvement .
1.4
Research Questions
The following research
questions, which correspond to the sections of the questionnaire, guided the
study:
(i) What are the
socio-economic characteristics of the respondents?
(ii) What NPK
fertilizer rates and methods of application do the respondents use in the
production of maize?
(iii) How do the
respondents perceive the effect of different NPK fertilizer application rates
on the growth of maize?
(iv) How do the
respondents perceive the effect of different NPK fertilizer application rates
on the yield of maize?
(v) What constraints
do the respondents face in the use of different NPK fertilizer application
rates, and what improvements do they suggest?
1.5
Research Hypotheses
The following null
hypotheses were tested at the 0.05 level of significance:
H01: There is no
significant relationship between the socio-economic characteristics of the
respondents and their NPK application rate.
H02: There is no
significant difference in the perceived growth of maize among respondents who
differ in their NPK application rate.
H03: There is no
significant difference in the perceived yield of maize among respondents who
differ in their NPK application rate.
1.6
Significance of the Study
The findings will give maize farmers in
Gwagwalada information on the NPK rates used by their peers and those they
perceive to give better growth and yield, which may help them use fertilizer
more efficiently. Extension agents will obtain local information for fertilizer
recommendations, and input suppliers will understand farmers' needs better.
The study will also add to the literature on
maize production in the Guinea savanna of Nigeria.
1.7
Scope and Limitations of the Study
The study covers maize farmers in Gwagwalada
Area Council, FCT. It is limited to NPK fertilizer application rates and covers
the respondents' socio-economic characteristics, fertilizer practices,
perceived effects on growth and yield, and constraints. It does not include
soil analysis or controlled field measurement of yield.
Limitations include reliance on respondents'
recall and perception, the difficulty some farmers have in converting local
measures of fertilizer (such as cups or bags) to standard rates, and the
limited number of respondents who could be reached. The findings should be
applied with care outside the study area.
1.8
Definition of Terms
NPK fertilizer: a compound fertilizer containing nitrogen
(N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K), such as NPK 15:15:15.
Application rate: the quantity of fertilizer applied per
unit area or per plant.
Growth: the visible development of the maize plant, such as
height, leaf number and vigour, as perceived by farmers.
Yield: the quantity of maize grain harvested per unit area.
Area Council: the local government unit of the Federal
Capital Territory.
Questionnaire: a structured set of written questions used
to collect information from respondents.
REFERENCES
Ederigbe, R., Eleojo, S. F.,
Ezekiel-Adewoyin, D., & Osunde, A. O. (2024). The effect of organic and
inorganic fertilizers on the production of maize in Minna, southern guinea
savanna zone of Nigeria. SVU-International Journal of Agricultural Sciences,
6(3), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.21608/svuijas.2024.287749.1367
Muhammad, A., Mani, H., Ibrahim, R.,
Bugaje, S., Dauda, H., Saleh, M. H., Mahmoud, B. A., & Dalhat, F. D.
(2024). Performance of three maize varieties as influenced by NPK fertilizer
rates and intra-row spacings at Samaru, northern Guinea savanna, Nigeria. FUDMA
Journal of Sciences, 8(6), 87–90.
https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2024-0806-2743
Ngonadi, E. N., Uko, I., & Okonkwo, N.
J. (2023). Profitability of selected weed control methods in maize (Zea mays
L. Moench) production at Igbariam in three successive months. International
Journal of Agriculture, Food and Biodiversity, 2(1), 37–42.
https://journals.unizik.edu.ng/ijafab/article/download/2799/2262/6729
This project contains full academic material including literature review, methodology,
data analysis and conclusion.
VERIFIED COMPLETE RESEARCH PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS
68 PAGES
Need a Custom Project Written for You?
Our professional writers can write a unique, plagiarism-free project on any topic in your department — delivered before your deadline.